Nail on the head, brother. View Comment

I agree, lets see his criminal record. If you come up with any comment that proves him wrong, he just reverts to name calling. View Comment

I would think that if it was unconstitutional the court system would have made it illegal to do so. In fact, the supreme court, does say the checkpoints are reasonable. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the constitutionality of police sobriety checkpoints. By a vote of 6-3, the Court held that these checkpoints met the Fourth Amendment standard of "reasonable search and seizure." Just because you think it is infringing on your rights, doesn't mean it is. It's your opinion. I am glad you resorted to negative comments, that just shows me the level of your education. View Comment

Not really, If your not drunk, what does a DUI checkpoint matter? A couple of minutes of your time? I think it is well worth it if it helps save a few lives. I go through a checkpoint maybe once a year if that at all. It is hardly an inconvenience. Also, putting all caps does not make me understand better. View Comment

Maybe if they stopped giving such deep discounts to "farms" on their taxes, the rest of us could afford living there. View Comment

Yes, Keeping drunk or distracted drivers off the road is a complete waste of tax dollars. Great point. You would think otherwise if your family was killed in a violent wreck because of one. Better to be proactive than reactive on things like this. View Comment

What is the salary comparison for the highest paid patrolman salary between the two? I would like to know that info. View Comment

Wow the guy below me was mad. View Comment